Skip to main content
BSS/OSS Academy
💰
Section 6.11

Fraud Patterns: SIM Swap, IRSF and More

Last updated 12 Oct 2026

01

At a glance

Five fraud patterns recur at every operator: SIM swap and account takeover, IRSF, subscription fraud, payment fraud and device or SIM fraud. Each gets in somewhere different, gives itself away through different signals, and is stopped by a control in a different system. Who carries the loss differs too, which shapes how hard each one is fought.

02

The picture

Five patterns, read the same way: entry, signal, control, and who carries the loss

  • SIM swap / takeover

    Gets in through

    SIM change in a shop, contact centre or online journey

    Gives itself away by

    SIM change, then password resets or a new IMEI soon after

    Control acts at

    Identity checks on SIM change; notify the old SIM; SIM-change recency for banks

    Loss falls on

    Mostly the customer; reputation and regulator fall on the operator

  • IRSF

    Gets in through

    Stolen or fraudulently opened SIMs, hacked PBXs and accounts

    Gives itself away by

    Bursts of calls to high-cost ranges never called before, overnight

    Control acts at

    Real-time thresholds and barring of international and premium destinations

    Loss falls on

    The operator: termination charges are owed whether or not its customer pays

  • Subscription fraud

    Gets in through

    Onboarding with a false or stolen identity

    Gives itself away by

    Identity that does not match bureau data; a high-value handset on a new account

    Control acts at

    Identity verification, credit limits and deposits, monitoring to first bill

    Loss falls on

    The operator; it ends in collections and looks like bad debt

  • Payment fraud

    Gets in through

    Stolen cards on top-ups, bill payments and online purchases

    Gives itself away by

    Many cards per account, rapid top-ups, declines then a success

    Control acts at

    3-D Secure, velocity limits, device fingerprinting

    Loss falls on

    The operator, later, as chargebacks and scheme fees

  • Device / SIM fraud

    Gets in through

    Cloned IMEIs, stolen handsets, SIM boxes

    Gives itself away by

    One IMEI with several SIMs; SIMs that only call out and never move

    Control acts at

    IMEI blocklists, test-call generation, new-SIM usage profiles

    Loss falls on

    The operator: interconnect revenue bypassed

Five patterns read the same way: where each gets in, the signal that gives it away, where the control acts, and who carries the loss
03

How it works

SIM swap and account takeover

A fraudster persuades a shop or contact centre, or abuses an online journey, to move the victim’s number to a SIM they control. They then receive the victim’s one-time passcodes and take over bank, email or social accounts. The operator’s direct loss is small; the customer’s can be large, and the reputational and regulatory impact falls on the operator.

  • Signals: a SIM change followed quickly by password resets or a new device IMEI; a change from an unusual channel, store or location; recent change of contact details; many SIM changes by one agent.
  • Controls: stronger identity checks for SIM changes; notification to the old SIM and email; cooling-off periods for high-risk changes; exposing SIM-change recency to banks, for example through the GSMA Open Gateway / CAMARA SIM Swap API.

International Revenue Share Fraud (IRSF)

Calls are generated to high-cost international or premium numbers whose termination revenue is shared with the fraudster. They come from stolen or fraudulently opened SIMs, compromised enterprise PBXs or hacked accounts. The operator owes the termination charges to the carrier chain whether or not its own customer ever pays.

SignalNormal for this accountObserved
International calls per day103,000
DestinationsTwo countries called regularlyHigh-cost ranges never called before
Time of dayOffice hoursOvernight and weekend
Call patternVaried durationsMany simultaneous calls of similar length

Controls: real-time thresholds on international and premium destinations; high-risk number range lists shared through industry bodies; automatic barring of international calls pending verification; limits on simultaneous calls; PBX security guidance for enterprise customers.

Subscription fraud

An account is opened with a false or stolen identity to obtain handsets, services or credit with no intention of paying. It ends in collections, which is why it is often misclassified as bad debt. Chasing it as debt recovers nothing and leaves the pattern in place.

  • Signals: identity data that does not match bureau records; several applications from one address, device or IP; high-value handsets on a new account; heavy international or premium use in the first days.
  • Controls: identity and document verification at onboarding; credit limits and deposits for new accounts; device-financing caps; closer monitoring until the first bill is paid.

Payment fraud

Stolen card details are used for top-ups, bill payments, online handset purchases or digital content. The loss arrives later as chargebacks, with scheme fees and, if rates stay high, pressure from the card schemes.

  • Signals: many cards on one account or many accounts on one card; rapid top-up velocity; card country different from customer and device location; repeated declines followed by a success.
  • Controls: strong customer authentication (3-D Secure); velocity limits per card, account and device; device fingerprinting; holding high-value top-ups for review.

Device and SIM fraud

Abuse of the device or SIM itself: cloned or altered IMEIs, stolen handsets reused on the network, and SIM boxes that route international calls through local SIMs to avoid interconnect charges (interconnect bypass).

  • Signals: one IMEI active with several SIMs, or in two places at once; IMEIs on stolen-device lists; SIMs that only make outbound calls, never move and never use data or SMS; many SIMs rotating in one device at one location.
  • Controls: IMEI blocklisting (national registers and the GSMA Device Registry); test-call generation to detect bypass routes; usage profiling of new SIMs; restricting bulk SIM sales.
04

Who owns what

EntitySystem of RecordSystem of EngagementSystem of ReferenceNotes
SIM change request and historyCRM / SIM managementShop, contact centre, online channelFraud management platform, banks via SIM Swap API—
High-risk number range listFraud management platform—OCS / network policyFed from industry intelligence sharing.
Customer identity and onboarding checksCRM—Fraud management platform, credit managementTMF629. Subscription fraud is decided here or not at all.
Payment and chargebackPayment gateway / payment management—Fraud management platform, BillingTMF676.
Device blocklist (IMEI)National register / GSMA Device RegistryEquipment identity register in the networkFraud management platform—
05

In practice

Legacy reality
Subscription fraud is routinely booked as bad debt. The account ends in collections, the debt is aged and written off, and the onboarding weakness that let it in stays open. Fraud confirmed only at write-off teaches the onboarding controls nothing.

Controls for these patterns live in systems the fraud team does not own: identity checks in CRM and retail journeys, barring in the OCS and network, 3-D Secure in the payment gateway, blocklists in the equipment identity register. Each pattern needs an owner in that system who will accept the friction the control adds.

SIM swap is the pattern where the operator’s loss is smallest and its exposure largest. Banks rely on the phone number for one-time passcodes, so the operator’s SIM-change process is part of other companies’ security. Exposing SIM-change recency through an API shifts some of the detection to the bank, but only if the operator’s SIM-change record is complete and current.

06

The trade-off

What it solves

Naming the pattern tells you where it gets in, which signal to watch and which system must apply the control.

What it does not solve

  • New patterns, which only appear through investigation and shared intelligence.
  • Patterns that cross several, such as subscription fraud feeding IRSF.
  • Process weaknesses in shops and contact centres, which no detection rule removes.

What it adds

  • Controls in many systems, each with its own owner and change process.
  • Friction for genuine customers at onboarding, SIM change and payment.
  • Industry lists and registers that must be loaded and kept current.

Architecture decision

How much friction should a SIM change carry?

  • Notify only

    Choose when SIM-change volumes are high, takeover cases are rare, and the old SIM and email can alert the customer in time.

  • Step-up verification

    Choose when changes come through channels where identity is weakest, such as phone and some retail, and takeover cases are rising.

  • Cooling-off period

    Choose when the change is high-risk (unusual channel, recent contact-detail change) and a short delay costs less than a takeover.

Breaks if the control is applied in one channel only. Fraudsters move to the weakest channel, and the SIM-change record banks rely on is incomplete.

07

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • Five patterns recur: SIM swap and takeover, IRSF, subscription, payment and device or SIM fraud
  • Each enters in a different place and is stopped by a control in a different system
  • In IRSF the operator owes termination charges whether or not its customer pays
  • A subscription-fraud account that ends in collections is still fraud; booking it as bad debt hides the pattern
  • SIM swap costs the operator little directly but exposes its customers’ banks and accounts

Check yourself

  • A batch of new postpaid accounts with high-value handsets reaches 90 days unpaid. Collections wants to send them to an agency. What do you check first?Show answer

    Whether they are subscription fraud: identity mismatches with bureau data, shared addresses, devices or IPs, and heavy early usage. If so, the agency recovers little and the onboarding control needs fixing.

  • A SIM shows only outbound calls, never moves and never uses data or SMS. What is it likely to be, and who loses?Show answer

    A SIM in a SIM box routing international calls through local SIMs. The operator loses the interconnect revenue that the bypass avoids.

  • The IRSF account is closed and written off. Why has the loss not stopped there?Show answer

    The termination charges for the calls already made are owed to the carrier chain whether or not the originating customer ever pays. Closing the account stops new calls; it does not reduce what is owed. Recovery means withholding or disputing payments where agreements allow.