Fraud Patterns: SIM Swap, IRSF and More
Last updated 12 Oct 2026
At a glance
Five fraud patterns recur at every operator: SIM swap and account takeover, IRSF, subscription fraud, payment fraud and device or SIM fraud. Each gets in somewhere different, gives itself away through different signals, and is stopped by a control in a different system. Who carries the loss differs too, which shapes how hard each one is fought.
The picture
Five patterns, read the same way: entry, signal, control, and who carries the loss
1 · Pattern
2 · Gets in through
3 · Gives itself away by
4 · Control acts at
5 · Loss falls on
SIM swap / takeover
Gets in through
SIM change in a shop, contact centre or online journey
Gives itself away by
SIM change, then password resets or a new IMEI soon after
Control acts at
Identity checks on SIM change; notify the old SIM; SIM-change recency for banks
Loss falls on
Mostly the customer; reputation and regulator fall on the operator
IRSF
Gets in through
Stolen or fraudulently opened SIMs, hacked PBXs and accounts
Gives itself away by
Bursts of calls to high-cost ranges never called before, overnight
Control acts at
Real-time thresholds and barring of international and premium destinations
Loss falls on
The operator: termination charges are owed whether or not its customer pays
Subscription fraud
Gets in through
Onboarding with a false or stolen identity
Gives itself away by
Identity that does not match bureau data; a high-value handset on a new account
Control acts at
Identity verification, credit limits and deposits, monitoring to first bill
Loss falls on
The operator; it ends in collections and looks like bad debt
Payment fraud
Gets in through
Stolen cards on top-ups, bill payments and online purchases
Gives itself away by
Many cards per account, rapid top-ups, declines then a success
Control acts at
3-D Secure, velocity limits, device fingerprinting
Loss falls on
The operator, later, as chargebacks and scheme fees
Device / SIM fraud
Gets in through
Cloned IMEIs, stolen handsets, SIM boxes
Gives itself away by
One IMEI with several SIMs; SIMs that only call out and never move
Control acts at
IMEI blocklists, test-call generation, new-SIM usage profiles
Loss falls on
The operator: interconnect revenue bypassed
How it works
SIM swap and account takeover
A fraudster persuades a shop or contact centre, or abuses an online journey, to move the victim’s number to a SIM they control. They then receive the victim’s one-time passcodes and take over bank, email or social accounts. The operator’s direct loss is small; the customer’s can be large, and the reputational and regulatory impact falls on the operator.
- Signals: a SIM change followed quickly by password resets or a new device IMEI; a change from an unusual channel, store or location; recent change of contact details; many SIM changes by one agent.
- Controls: stronger identity checks for SIM changes; notification to the old SIM and email; cooling-off periods for high-risk changes; exposing SIM-change recency to banks, for example through the GSMA Open Gateway / CAMARA SIM Swap API.
International Revenue Share Fraud (IRSF)
Calls are generated to high-cost international or premium numbers whose termination revenue is shared with the fraudster. They come from stolen or fraudulently opened SIMs, compromised enterprise PBXs or hacked accounts. The operator owes the termination charges to the carrier chain whether or not its own customer ever pays.
| Signal | Normal for this account | Observed |
|---|---|---|
| International calls per day | 10 | 3,000 |
| Destinations | Two countries called regularly | High-cost ranges never called before |
| Time of day | Office hours | Overnight and weekend |
| Call pattern | Varied durations | Many simultaneous calls of similar length |
Controls: real-time thresholds on international and premium destinations; high-risk number range lists shared through industry bodies; automatic barring of international calls pending verification; limits on simultaneous calls; PBX security guidance for enterprise customers.
Subscription fraud
An account is opened with a false or stolen identity to obtain handsets, services or credit with no intention of paying. It ends in collections, which is why it is often misclassified as bad debt. Chasing it as debt recovers nothing and leaves the pattern in place.
- Signals: identity data that does not match bureau records; several applications from one address, device or IP; high-value handsets on a new account; heavy international or premium use in the first days.
- Controls: identity and document verification at onboarding; credit limits and deposits for new accounts; device-financing caps; closer monitoring until the first bill is paid.
Payment fraud
Stolen card details are used for top-ups, bill payments, online handset purchases or digital content. The loss arrives later as chargebacks, with scheme fees and, if rates stay high, pressure from the card schemes.
- Signals: many cards on one account or many accounts on one card; rapid top-up velocity; card country different from customer and device location; repeated declines followed by a success.
- Controls: strong customer authentication (3-D Secure); velocity limits per card, account and device; device fingerprinting; holding high-value top-ups for review.
Device and SIM fraud
Abuse of the device or SIM itself: cloned or altered IMEIs, stolen handsets reused on the network, and SIM boxes that route international calls through local SIMs to avoid interconnect charges (interconnect bypass).
- Signals: one IMEI active with several SIMs, or in two places at once; IMEIs on stolen-device lists; SIMs that only make outbound calls, never move and never use data or SMS; many SIMs rotating in one device at one location.
- Controls: IMEI blocklisting (national registers and the GSMA Device Registry); test-call generation to detect bypass routes; usage profiling of new SIMs; restricting bulk SIM sales.
Who owns what
| Entity | System of Record | System of Engagement | System of Reference | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIM change request and history | CRM / SIM management | Shop, contact centre, online channel | Fraud management platform, banks via SIM Swap API | — |
| High-risk number range list | Fraud management platform | — | OCS / network policy | Fed from industry intelligence sharing. |
| Customer identity and onboarding checks | CRM | — | Fraud management platform, credit management | TMF629. Subscription fraud is decided here or not at all. |
| Payment and chargeback | Payment gateway / payment management | — | Fraud management platform, Billing | TMF676. |
| Device blocklist (IMEI) | National register / GSMA Device Registry | Equipment identity register in the network | Fraud management platform | — |
In practice
Controls for these patterns live in systems the fraud team does not own: identity checks in CRM and retail journeys, barring in the OCS and network, 3-D Secure in the payment gateway, blocklists in the equipment identity register. Each pattern needs an owner in that system who will accept the friction the control adds.
SIM swap is the pattern where the operator’s loss is smallest and its exposure largest. Banks rely on the phone number for one-time passcodes, so the operator’s SIM-change process is part of other companies’ security. Exposing SIM-change recency through an API shifts some of the detection to the bank, but only if the operator’s SIM-change record is complete and current.
The trade-off
What it solves
Naming the pattern tells you where it gets in, which signal to watch and which system must apply the control.
What it does not solve
- New patterns, which only appear through investigation and shared intelligence.
- Patterns that cross several, such as subscription fraud feeding IRSF.
- Process weaknesses in shops and contact centres, which no detection rule removes.
What it adds
- Controls in many systems, each with its own owner and change process.
- Friction for genuine customers at onboarding, SIM change and payment.
- Industry lists and registers that must be loaded and kept current.
Architecture decision
How much friction should a SIM change carry?
Notify only
Choose when SIM-change volumes are high, takeover cases are rare, and the old SIM and email can alert the customer in time.
Step-up verification
Choose when changes come through channels where identity is weakest, such as phone and some retail, and takeover cases are rising.
Cooling-off period
Choose when the change is high-risk (unusual channel, recent contact-detail change) and a short delay costs less than a takeover.
Breaks if the control is applied in one channel only. Fraudsters move to the weakest channel, and the SIM-change record banks rely on is incomplete.
Takeaways
Key Takeaways
- Five patterns recur: SIM swap and takeover, IRSF, subscription, payment and device or SIM fraud
- Each enters in a different place and is stopped by a control in a different system
- In IRSF the operator owes termination charges whether or not its customer pays
- A subscription-fraud account that ends in collections is still fraud; booking it as bad debt hides the pattern
- SIM swap costs the operator little directly but exposes its customers’ banks and accounts
Check yourself
A batch of new postpaid accounts with high-value handsets reaches 90 days unpaid. Collections wants to send them to an agency. What do you check first?Show answerHide
Whether they are subscription fraud: identity mismatches with bureau data, shared addresses, devices or IPs, and heavy early usage. If so, the agency recovers little and the onboarding control needs fixing.
A SIM shows only outbound calls, never moves and never uses data or SMS. What is it likely to be, and who loses?Show answerHide
A SIM in a SIM box routing international calls through local SIMs. The operator loses the interconnect revenue that the bypass avoids.
The IRSF account is closed and written off. Why has the loss not stopped there?Show answerHide
The termination charges for the calls already made are owed to the carrier chain whether or not the originating customer ever pays. Closing the account stops new calls; it does not reduce what is owed. Recovery means withholding or disputing payments where agreements allow.